원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
역외 구조에 우호적인 것으로 알려진 관할 구역에 비거주 이사를 두고 법인 계좌를 개설하는 것을 알아보고 있습니다. 국내 계좌보다 KYC 요구 사항이 더 엄격할 것이라는 점은 이해합니다. 제 질문은, 실질적으로 이사들이 물리적으로 존재하지 않을 때 그들이 정말로 어떤 종류의 실사를 찾고 있느냐는 것입니다. 단순히 공증된 여권과 공과금 청구서인가요, 아니면 법인 자금이 명확히 합법적이라 할지라도 이사들 자신의 부의 출처를 더 깊이 파고드는 것인가요? 체크리스트를 넘어선 실제적인 장애물을 가늠해보고 싶습니다.
This is a really good question. I've always wondered about the practical side of KYC for non-resident directors too. Are they typically looking for proof of income or just identity verification for everyone involved?
จากประสบการณ์ที่เคยเปิดมานะคะ เรื่องความเข้มงวดของ KYC สำหรับกรรมการที่ไม่ใช่ผู้อยู่อาศัยเนี่ย มันจะขึ้นอยู่กับนโยบายของแต่ละธนาคารเลยค่ะ บางที่อาจจะขอเอกสารเพิ่มเยอะหน่อย พวกใบรับรองถิ่นที่อยู่ หรือที่มาของแหล่งเงินทุนก็สำคัญมากๆ ค่ะ
Ah, the age-old question of how much information is just enough to satisfy the regulators without actually revealing anything substantial. From what I've seen, 'strict' often translates to 'we'll ask for everything, and then some, just in case.' Good luck explaining the intricate web of offshore shell companies to a compliance officer who still thinks a fax machine is cutting-edge technology.
Traderforum · 한국어