DAO를 위한 KYC 온보딩 - 실제적인 어려움은?
원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
DAO가 전통적인 금융 시스템과 상호작용할 때 KYC/KYB를 어떻게 처리했는지 궁금합니다. 특히 최종 실소유주를 식별하는 부분에서요. 분산된 특성 때문에 규제 준수 지뢰밭처럼 느껴집니다.
원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
DAO가 전통적인 금융 시스템과 상호작용할 때 KYC/KYB를 어떻게 처리했는지 궁금합니다. 특히 최종 실소유주를 식별하는 부분에서요. 분산된 특성 때문에 규제 준수 지뢰밭처럼 느껴집니다.
This is a really pertinent question. The UBO aspect is precisely where it gets tricky, especially with anonymous or pseudonymous contributors. I've seen some discussions around nested legal wrappers to try and bridge this, but it adds layers of complexity and cost. Have you looked into any specific solutions or frameworks yet?
This is a super interesting point. Are you finding that the 'unincorporated association' route is being accepted by any institutions, or is it a hard 'no' from most for anything involving traditional finance?
It's definitely a complex area. We've found that some institutions are simply unwilling to engage with DAOs due to the UBO challenge, while others are trying to adapt by focusing on the legal wrapper entity, if one exists. Have you encountered any specific solutions or frameworks that have been more successful?
Traderforum · 한국어