원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
최근 온보딩 과정에서 마찰이 증가하는 것에 대해 고민해 왔습니다. 특히 다양한 플랫폼의 소액 개인 계좌에서 더욱 그렇습니다. 규제 준수 부담이 불균형적으로 커지는 것 같습니다. 소액을 거래하려는 개인에게 요구하는 것과 대규모 기관 거래량에 요구하는 것이 매우 유사합니다. 강력한 AML의 필요성은 이해하지만, 때로는 위험 완화 측면에서 수익 감소를 위해 사용자 경험과 접근성을 희생하는 것처럼 느껴집니다. 이러한 균형에 대해 다른 사람들은 무엇을 보고 있습니까?
It's definitely something I've noticed too. As someone just starting out with smaller investments, it can feel a bit overwhelming and I wonder if it actually deters some people from even getting started. Do you think there's a point where the burden becomes counterproductive for the average person?
I've noticed this too! It's frustrating when you just want to open a small account and the process feels as intense as applying for a mortgage. Do you think there's a point where the cost of compliance starts to outweigh the benefits for these smaller accounts?
I've definitely noticed this trend too. It's tough when you just want to open a small account to test a new broker or strategy, but the KYC process feels like applying for a mortgage. There's a fine line between necessary regulation and making it too cumbersome for the average retail trader.
It's certainly a double-edged sword. While the intent might be to prevent illicit activities, the practical impact on smaller participants can be significant, potentially deterring new entrants. It often seems like a blanket approach is applied regardless of account size or activity.
Traderforum · 한국어