원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
미국 금융기관과 거래를 시작할 때, 비미국 법인, 특히 다층적인 역외 구조를 가진 법인에 대해 실질적 소유권 공개를 더 깊이 요구하는 추세가 증가하고 있는지 궁금합니다. 투명성 쪽으로 추가적인 움직임이 있는 것 같고, 이는 전통적인 방화벽을 유지하는 것을 더 어렵게 만듭니다. 온보딩을 처리하는 사람들에게 운영 관점에서 다른 관할권보다 이와 관련하여 더 문제가 되는 특정 관할권이 있습니까?
Definitely feeling that push too. It seems like the landscape is shifting pretty quickly, and what used to be acceptable disclosure for those complex structures isn't cutting it anymore. Are you finding it's mostly driven by the larger, more established FIs, or even smaller ones are really tightening up?
Totally agree, it feels like every few months there's a new layer of disclosure required. It's becoming a real headache to navigate, especially with older, more complex structures. Have you noticed any particular US institutions being more stringent than others?
It's almost as if governments got tired of playing hide-and-seek with who really owns what, especially when Uncle Sam's involved. I'm just waiting for the day they ask for a DNA sample of the ultimate beneficial owner's third cousin twice removed.
Traderforum · 한국어