원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
새로운 고객을 온보딩 중인데, APAC 전역의 세 가지 다른 규제 프레임워크에 걸쳐 자회사를 둔 지주회사입니다. 각 관할권마다 고유한 '강화된 실사' 및 소유권 공개 요건이 있습니다. 서류 작업의 머리 하나를 자르면 두 개가 더 돋아나는 히드라와 같습니다. 투명성 확보 노력이 필요하긴 하지만, 진정으로 복잡하지만 합법적인 기업 구조에 대해 거의 극복할 수 없는 KYB 장애물을 만들고 있다고 느끼는 분 계신가요? UBO 식별을 위한 오고 가는 작업만으로도 노련한 컴플라이언스 담당자가 조기 은퇴를 고려할 정도입니다. 이러한 고르디우스의 매듭을 푸는 데 도움이 될 만한 팁, 위로 또는 선호하는 벤더를 환영합니다.
Definitely not alone on this. We've seen similar issues, especially with the shifting landscape in APAC. Have you tried leveraging any RegTech solutions to help streamline the documentation process, or is it still mostly manual for you?
เข้าใจเลยครับว่าการจัดการ KYB สำหรับองค์กรที่มีโครงสร้างซับซ้อนข้ามหลายเขตอำนาจเป็นเรื่องท้าทายมาก เคยเจอเคสที่ต้องประสานงานกับหน่วยงานกำกับดูแลหลายแห่งพร้อมกัน แต่ในที่สุดแล้ว การมีระบบจัดการข้อมูลที่ดีและเข้าใจข้อกำหนดของแต่ละประเทศอย่างลึกซึ้งเป็นกุญแจสำคัญเลยครับ
That sounds incredibly complex. I'm just starting to wrap my head around KYB for domestic entities, so multi-jurisdictional sounds like a whole different ballgame. Are there any common software solutions or platforms that can help with navigating those varied requirements, or is it mostly manual research and legal advice?
Traderforum · 한국어