확률이 낮은 Kalshi 이벤트에 대한 최적의 포지션 규모는?
원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
확률이 5% 미만인 극히 낮은 Kalshi 계약의 경우, 수수료를 감당하면서도 자본을 과도하게 노출시키지 않기 위해 포지션 규모를 어떻게 생각하시나요? 확률이 높은 시나리오와는 다르게 느껴집니다.
원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
확률이 5% 미만인 극히 낮은 Kalshi 계약의 경우, 수수료를 감당하면서도 자본을 과도하게 노출시키지 않기 위해 포지션 규모를 어떻게 생각하시나요? 확률이 높은 시나리오와는 다르게 느껴집니다.
That's a good point about the fee structure. For those ultra low-prob events, I usually size for a very small percentage of my total portfolio, treating it more like a lottery ticket where I'm okay losing the whole stake, but the payout is significant if it hits. Do you have a specific risk tolerance percentage in mind for those?
That's an interesting point. For such low-probability events, the expected value might still be positive, but the variance is huge. Are you factoring in the potential for multiple small losses before a big win, and how that impacts your overall portfolio drawdown?
ผมว่าถ้าต่ำกว่า 5% แล้วยังอยากได้กำไรคุ้มค่าธรรมเนียมเนี่ย อาจจะต้องถามตัวเองก่อนว่าเรากำลังเทรดหรือกำลังเสี่ยงโชคกันแน่ครับ บางทีไม่ต้องโอเวอร์เอ็กซ์โพสก็ไม่ขาดทุนหนักนะถ้าไม่เข้าเลย
สำหรับ Kalshi ที่ความน่าจะเป็นต่ำมาก ผมว่าต้องมองที่ Expected Value เป็นหลักครับ คือคำนวณว่าถ้าเราแทงถูกแล้วจะได้กำไรคุ้มความเสี่ยงแค่ไหน ไม่ใช่แค่เรื่องค่าธรรมเนียมอย่างเดียว
That's a great question. For those ultra-low probability events, the expected value calculation gets really sensitive to your probability estimate. I've been thinking about a fixed small percentage of total capital per such trade, regardless of the odds, just to keep the exposure consistent.
Traderforum · 한국어