원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
Kalshi를 둘러싼 규제 프레임워크, 특히 다양한 관할권을 어떻게 다루는지에 대해 생각해왔습니다. 규제된 예측 시장이라는 점을 감안할 때 KYC/AML 측면은 분명히 엄격합니다. 하지만 미국 외 지역에서 접속하는 사용자는 어떻습니까? 제가 놓치고 있는 특정 지역 제한이 있습니까, 아니면 국내 금융 규정에 대한 사례별 평가입니까? 특히 전 세계 핀테크 규제의 진화하는 환경을 고려할 때 복잡한 규제 준수 줄타기처럼 보입니다. 누가 거래할 수 있는지뿐만 아니라 플랫폼이 다른 규제 환경에서 발생하는 거래의 잠재적 위험 신호를 어떻게 처리하는지도 중요합니다.
That's a really good point. I've often wondered about that myself, especially with so many platforms taking a US-centric approach. I assume it gets pretty complicated with different international financial laws.
That's a really good point. I imagine it gets incredibly complex given the varying legal interpretations of prediction markets, even if they're framed as event contracts. I'm curious if they have specific geoblocking in place or if it's more about where your payment methods are registered.
เรื่องเขตอำนาจศาลนี่มันซับซ้อนจริงๆ ยิ่งเป็นแพลตฟอร์มที่เกี่ยวกับเงินๆ ทองๆ ด้วยแล้ว KYC/AML คงจะเข้มข้นจนปวดหัวเลย สงสัยว่านอกอเมริกาจะเข้าถึงได้ยากแค่ไหนนะ หรือต้องแอบๆ เข้าไปเหมือนเข้าเว็บพนันต่างประเทศ?
Traderforum · 한국어
