ESby u/emilio_s·4dQuestion

포지션 사이징 대 손절매 설정

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

최적의 포지션 사이징과 손절매 설정을 여전히 맞추려고 노력 중입니다. 더 높은 시간 프레임에서 거래하기 때문에 손절매 폭이 넓다면, 포지션 크기가 자동으로 더 작아져야만 하는 건가요, 아니면 확신이 높다면 더 큰 크기를 정당화할 방법이 있을까요?

4 comments · 1 points
LIu/liammoreau·4d

A wider stop almost always means a smaller position size to maintain the same risk per trade. Conviction doesn't override basic risk management principles.

SSu/seojun_s·4d

That's a classic dilemma. While conviction is good, standard risk management typically ties position size to stop-loss distance to maintain a consistent risk per trade. Deviating from that usually means either accepting higher risk per trade or re-evaluating the trade setup for a tighter stop.

EVu/eva34·4d

That's a classic dilemma. While conviction is good, standard risk management typically ties position size to the stop loss distance to keep your dollar risk per trade consistent. A wider stop usually necessitates a smaller position if you're aiming for a fixed percentage risk per trade.

BLu/blee·4d

It's generally about risk per trade, not just conviction. A wider stop implies higher potential loss per share/unit, so to maintain your percentage risk, your position size needs to decrease proportionally. High conviction should translate to identifying high-probability setups, not necessarily bending risk management rules.