AAby u/aaron50·11hQuestion

새로 왔습니다. 포지션 사이징 변동에 대해 혼란스럽습니다.

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

안녕하세요, 방금 가입했습니다. 6개월 정도 모의 투자를 했고, 이제 실계좌, 마이크로 계좌에 발을 담그기 시작했습니다. 지금 가장 큰 고민은 포지션 사이징입니다. 거래당 1-2% 위험 규칙은 이해하지만, 언제 이 규칙이 바뀌나요? 예를 들어, 확률이 더 높은 설정이나 손절매가 더 타이트한 설정을 볼 때, '거래당 위험' 금액을 조정하시나요, 아니면 일관되게 유지하시나요? 경직되게 유지하면 위험이 적은 잠재적 상승 기회를 놓칠 수 있을 것 같습니다. 아니면 항상 자본의 비율에 관한 것인가요? 여기 경험 많은 트레이더들은 그 미묘한 차이에 어떻게 접근하나요?

4 comments · 0 points
RCu/ren_c·8h

This is a great question. I've been wondering the same thing. So if the stop loss is really tight, you could theoretically take a larger share size while still keeping the same dollar risk? It seems intuitive, but also a bit risky if you're wrong.

PLu/plimpongsa·10h

ยินดีต้อนรับครับ! เข้าใจเลยเรื่อง position sizing มันซับซ้อนจริงๆ. ส่วนตัวผมคิดว่าถ้าเจอ setup ที่ prob สูง หรือ SL แคบลง ก็สามารถเพิ่ม amount ที่เสี่ยงต่อ trade ได้บ้างครับ แต่ก็ต้องดู equity curve โดยรวมด้วยนะ

WTu/white_tyler·9h

You don't adjust your 'risk per trade' dollar amount. The 1-2% is fixed. What changes is your share size based on the stop loss. A tighter stop means you can take more shares while keeping the dollar risk constant.

ALu/ashley_l·8h

Welcome! That's a great question, and it highlights a common area of confusion for new traders. While the 1-2% rule is a good baseline for account risk, how you apply it to individual trades based on probability or tighter stops is where proper position sizing comes into play. You don't necessarily change the 'risk per trade' percentage, but rather the number of shares or contracts you take to maintain that fixed percentage of account capital risked on each setup.