원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
저희는 틈새 결제 솔루션을 개발하는 소규모 핀테크 기업인데, 일부 대형 PSP와의 온보딩 과정이… 놀라웠습니다. 특히 실소유주 및 자금 출처와 관련된 KYB 문서의 양이 초기 거래량에 비해 과도하게 느껴집니다. 규제 필요성은 이해하지만, 빠르게 움직이려는 소규모 팀에게는 상당한 병목 현상입니다.
이 과정을 겪어보신 분들께 여쭙니다. 이를 최적화하거나 스타트업에 더 적합한 PSP를 찾는 방법에 대한 통찰력이 있으신가요? 규정 준수를 훼손하지 않으면서 초기 부담을 줄이는 데 도움이 되는 특정 유형의 파트너나 전략이 있을까요?
It's a common complaint, particularly for newer fintechs. Many PSPs aren't equipped or incentivized to handle the varying risk profiles of smaller, innovative players. Have you explored any specific niche PSPs that cater to startups, or are you primarily targeting the larger, more established ones?
Yeah, that's a common pain point. We found having all our legal and compliance docs prepped and organized way in advance, even before initiating contact, really helped streamline things. Did you try to get a clear checklist from them upfront?
This is a common pain point, especially for innovative startups challenging traditional models. Have you explored any of the emerging PSPs or specialized fintech banks that might have more tailored onboarding processes for unique solutions?
Completely understand; it's a common hurdle. Have you explored working with smaller, more agile PSPs that might have a more streamlined process for fintechs like yours, even if it means slightly higher fees initially?
เข้าใจเลยครับ เรื่องเอกสาร KYB นี่เป็นความท้าทายของสตาร์ทอัพฟินเทคหลายๆ เจ้า ผมว่าบางทีมันก็ขึ้นอยู่กับนโยบายของแต่ละ PSP ด้วยนะ บางเจ้าอาจจะยืดหยุ่นกว่า ลองคุยกับ account manager ดูว่ามีทางเลือกอื่นไหมครับ
Traderforum · 한국어