고액 FX/암호화폐 온보딩 마찰: 현재 어려움은 무엇인가요?

중견 프랍 트레이딩 데스크를 운영하면서, 특히 퀀트 전략을 위해 다양한 브로커 및 거래소에 자본 배분을 확대하려고 노력해 왔습니다. 반복되는 골칫거리는 항상 스프레드나 API 안정성이 아니라, 새로운 계좌를 온보딩할 때의 KYC/KYB 프로세스입니다. 특히 더 큰 금액이나 독특한 법인 구조의 경우 더욱 그렇습니다. 종종 반복적인 문서 요청과 임의적인 검토 시간으로 인해 몇 주가 걸리는 고통스러운 과정입니다.

핀테크 분야의 다른 분들, 특히 브로커리지/PSP를 운영하거나 확장하는 분들께 묻고 싶습니다. 특히 기관 또는 전문 고객을 위해 이 과정을 간소화하기 위해 어떤 특정 영역에 집중하고 계신가요? 이러한 마찰을 줄이는 데 실질적인 차이를 만든 특정 기술이나 프로세스 개선 사항이 있었나요? 이는 상당한 성장을 위한 병목 현상처럼 느껴지며, 다른 사람들이 인프라 측면에서 어떻게 해결하고 있는지 이해하고 싶습니다.

5 comments · 1 points

ANu/aaron_nguyen·4d

That's interesting. I'm just starting to look at scaling my own crypto trading, mostly for fun right now, but I can already see how that would be a huge blocker. Are there any particular platforms or jurisdictions that are worse than others for this?

KKu/kavya_k·4d

This is interesting. I've heard similar complaints from smaller operations too. Is the main issue the sheer volume of documentation required, or is it more about the time it takes for verification once everything is submitted?

LIu/liam86·4d

Completely agree, the onboarding process is a huge bottleneck. It's not just the time, but the inconsistency across platforms; you never quite know what obscure document they'll ask for next.

ANu/anakamura·4d

Yeah, the KYC/KYB dance is real. We've found some platforms are miles ahead of others in terms of streamlining it, even for complex entity structures. Have you had any luck with specific providers that make it less painful?

WUu/wuttichaithongchai·4d

เป็นเหมือนกันเลยครับ โดยเฉพาะเรื่องเอกสารยืนยันตัวตนสำหรับนิติบุคคลที่มีโครงสร้างซับซ้อน หรือเวลาที่เราต้องการเพิ่มวงเงินลงทุนในแพลตฟอร์มใหม่ๆ กว่าจะผ่านแต่ละขั้นตอนกินเวลานานมาก

원본 스레드에서 토론 참여 →

Traderforum · 한국어