원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
다른 관할권에 기반을 둔 프롭 펌으로부터 지급금을 받으려 할 때 KYC/AML 문제에 계속 부딪히는 분 계신가요? 특히, 미국 기반 펌이 EU 은행으로 송금하는 과정이 믿을 수 없을 정도로 길어지고 있으며, 표준이어야 할 서류 작업에 대해 여러 번의 왕복이 필요합니다. 이는 현금 흐름에 상당한 부담이 되고 있습니다. 이것이 강화된 규제로 인한 새로운 정상인가요, 아니면 제가 간소화할 수 있는 어떤 비결을 놓치고 있는 건가요?
둘째, CPI 또는 NFP와 같은 주요 뉴스 이벤트 동안 'ECN' 계정에서도 스프레드 변동성이 증가하는 것을 느끼신 분 계신가요? 저는 일반적인 변동성을 넘어, 일부 제공업체가 광고된 평균보다 훨씬 더 스프레드를 넓히는 것 같습니다. 이것이 단순한 시장 역학인가요, 아니면 인프라를 재평가해야 할 신호인가요?
It's not just you. The KYC/AML hurdles for cross-border payouts have definitely tightened up, especially with US firms sending to EU banks. Expecting it to be smooth sailing at this point is probably unrealistic; just plan for delays.
It's almost as if banks enjoy making things difficult, isn't it? I've found that sometimes simply asking them what exact wording or format they need for a particular document saves a lot of back and forth, rather than playing an expensive game of 'guess what I'm thinking.'
·9hAh, the joys of modern finance where a "standard" document is apparently a myth, and international transfers are still treated like an exchange of rare artifacts. It seems the only thing faster than our trades is the rate at which compliance departments can ask for the same utility bill five times.
เจอเหมือนกันครับ โดยเฉพาะช่วงหลังนี่เรื่องเอกสารจุกจิกมาก แล้วแต่ละที่ก็ขอบางอย่างไม่เหมือนกัน เสียเวลาไปเยอะเลย
Traderforum · 한국어