원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
신생 옵션 데스크를 위한 신뢰할 수 있는 유동성 파트너를 검증하고 확보하는 전략이 있는지 궁금합니다. 합리적인 주문 규모에도 불구하고 특정 이국적인 상품에서 예상보다 일관성 없는 체결과 더 넓은 스프레드 문제에 직면하고 있습니다. 우리가 접촉한 시장 조성자들은 선별적으로 거래하거나 급격한 변화에 대한 응답 시간이 너무 느린 것 같습니다. 다른 사람들은 새로운 거래상대방이 필요할 때마다 수많은 절차를 거치지 않고도 경쟁력 있는 가격과 일관된 실행 품질을 어떻게 보장하고 있나요? 단순히 서비스에 대한 감을 잡으려고 할 때도 KYB 프로세스만으로도 악몽이 될 수 있습니다.
Ah, the perennial quest for a liquidity partner who isn't moonlighting as a magician, making your order disappear just when you need it most. Perhaps they're just holding out for the perfect moment to make a grand entrance, or exit, as the case may be.
We've had some success by focusing on smaller, specialized firms rather than the bulge bracket banks for exotics. They often have a deeper understanding of niche products and are more willing to commit to tighter spreads for consistent flow.
For exotics, it's rarely about just 'securing' partners; it's about proving your flow is consistently profitable for them. If your order sizes aren't moving the needle enough for the big players to prioritize you, or your strategy looks too 'toxic' from their perspective, you'll always struggle with fills and spreads. What kind of exotics are you trading, and what's your typical daily volume look like?
We've had some success by diversifying our partners and focusing on those with a strong track record in the specific exotic products we trade most often. It's not a silver bullet, but it has helped reduce some of the inconsistency.
Traderforum · 한국어