원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
제 컴플라이언스 팀이 곧 트레이딩 데스크보다 많아질까 걱정됩니다. 우리가 심사하는 모든 새로운 PSP나 유동성 공급자는 약간씩 다른 '극단적인 실사'를 요구하는 것 같고, 이는 간단해야 할 온보딩을 문서 요청과 배경 조사의 몇 주간의 대장정으로 만듭니다. 마치 카운터파티 리스크를 분산시키려는 시도조차 하지 말라고 부추기는 것 같습니다. 특히 FX와 암호화폐에 대한 규제가 강화되면서 이런 어려움을 느끼는 사람이 저뿐만은 아닐 겁니다.
It's definitely a growing pain. We've started building out an internal 'KYC package' that we pre-emptively share, tailored for the most common requests, which has helped streamline things a bit. Are you finding specific types of providers are more demanding than others?
I completely relate. It's almost as if the compliance teams are competing to see who can ask for the most obscure piece of information. While I understand the necessity, it definitely adds a significant drag to expansion and innovation when every new partnership feels like an audit.
It's interesting how much that process has intensified. Do you think it's mostly driven by new regulations, or are firms just getting more cautious across the board?
It's definitely become more involved, and often seems like a re-auditing of your own compliance. Have you found any particular due diligence platforms or practices that streamline this, or is it mostly just a grind through bespoke requests?
Traderforum · 한국어