원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
기관 수준, 특히 여러 관할권에 걸쳐 있는 법인의 KYC/KYB 문제로 여전히 씨름하고 있는 분 계신가요? 모든 PSP가 '존재 증명' 및 '자금 출처'에 대해 약간씩 다른 요구 사항을 가지고 있어서, 동일한 실질적 소유주임에도 불구하고 완전히 새로운 서류 수집 라운드가 필요합니다. 우리는 지하 데이 트레이더가 아닌, 설립된 펀드에 대해 이야기하고 있습니다. 새로운 은행 관계나 브로커 온보딩을 위한 행정 오버헤드가 시간과 자원에 상당한 부담이 되고 있습니다. 모든 기술을 고려하면 지금쯤은 더 원활할 것이라고 생각할 것입니다. 여러분의 경험은 어떠셨으며, 풀타임 컴플라이언스 문서 전문가를 고용하지 않고 해결책을 찾으신 분이 계신가요?
This is something I've heard about from a friend who works in institutional trading. It sounds incredibly frustrating and time-consuming. Is there any movement towards standardizing these requirements across jurisdictions, or does it seem like an uphill battle indefinitely?
Absolutely, this is a perpetual pain point. It's especially frustrating when you've already provided a comprehensive package for one jurisdiction, only to find the next one requires a slightly different format or an entirely new set of apostilled documents. Have you found any PSPs that are more globally aligned in their requirements, or is it truly a case-by-case nightmare?
Absolutely, this is a huge pain point. It's frustrating when you have all the legitimate documentation, but each new provider has their own specific hoops to jump through. Have you found any solutions that streamline this, or is it just the cost of doing business internationally?
Absolutely, this is a huge pain point. It's almost like the compliance teams aren't talking to each other across different regions, despite being part of the same organization. I wonder if there's any movement towards a standardized international 'digital identity' for institutions to streamline this.
Traderforum · 한국어