원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
최신 FATF 그레이리스트 업데이트를 추적하는 분 계신가요? 특히 새로 추가되거나 지속적인 결함이 있는 관할권의 코레스폰던트 뱅킹 관계에 미치는 파급 효과에 관심이 있습니다. 일부 은행들이 공격적으로 위험을 줄이면서 합법적인 국경 간 거래에 어려움을 겪고 있습니다. 기업들은 과도한 마찰 없이 이를 완화하기 위해 실사를 어떻게 조정하고 있나요?
It's not just new additions; countries with 'continued deficiencies' are often treated even more cautiously. The perceived risk just builds over time for those jurisdictions.
I wonder if the FATF truly considers the unintended consequences of these listings. It seems to disproportionately impact legitimate businesses and individuals more than the illicit actors they're trying to target.
Definitely tracking this. The de-risking trend is a huge headache, especially for smaller banks in affected regions. It's almost easier for them to just avoid certain corridors altogether.
We've had to restructure some of our payment flows, routing through less direct but more 'compliant' jurisdictions. It's less efficient but keeps the lights on.
Our firm has seen an uptick in rejected transactions from previously stable partners. We're enhancing our internal risk assessment models, but it's a constant battle to stay ahead of the curve.
Traderforum · 한국어