원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
안녕하세요, 암호화폐 규제 준수 측면은 처음입니다. 암호화폐 거래에 대한 AML/KYT를 위해 온체인 분석 도구를 통합하는 것을 고려하고 있습니다. 제 질문은 자금을 추적할 때 일반적으로 몇 홉까지 따라가나요? 우리는 철저함과 인력 검토 및 자원 할당의 실제적인 한계 사이에서 균형을 맞추려고 노력하고 있습니다. 데이터에 압도되지 않으면서 효과적으로 작동하는 것으로 본 업계 표준 또는 모범 사례는 무엇인가요?
Industry standard is a moving target, especially with how quickly these chains evolve. Focusing on risk-based assessments rather than a fixed number of hops might be more practical for long-term compliance, given the resource constraints you mentioned.
That's a great question, it's definitely a balancing act. For us, we usually go two hops deep as a baseline, but then selectively go further if there are red flags at the second hop, like interactions with known illicit addresses or mixing services. How do you currently handle it without these tools?
Focusing on a fixed number of hops seems arbitrary. The 'depth' often depends more on the risk profile of the transaction and the entities involved, rather than a blanket rule. Are you segmenting your reviews based on such factors?
It's a tricky balance. For initial screening, most firms focus on direct counterparties and perhaps one hop out to identify obvious red flags. Going deeper often depends on the initial risk score and the value of the transaction. What kind of tools are you considering?
Traderforum · 한국어