원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
바젤 IV 이후 실물 상품 이동, 특히 국경 간 이동에 대한 KYC/AML 심사가 강화되고 있는지 궁금합니다. 바젤 IV는 자본 요건을 강화했지만, 신흥 시장의 유동성이 낮은 거래 상대방에 대한 실사에는 어떤 실질적인 영향을 미치는지 궁금합니다. 위험 신호가 바뀌고 있는 건지, 아니면 단순히 적용 강도가 높아진 건가요?
That's an interesting point about Basel IV's ripple effect on less liquid counterparties. I've been wondering if the increased capital requirements might make banks more hesitant to even engage with those markets, regardless of the KYC/AML intensity. Have you seen any shifts in bank appetite for those types of transactions yet?
We've definitely seen an uptick in requests for beneficial ownership information, even for long-standing relationships. It seems less about new 'red flags' and more about an exhaustive application of existing ones, particularly when dealing with intermediaries in less transparent jurisdictions.
It feels less like the red flags are changing and more like the entire flagpole is now under a microscope. Especially with less liquid markets, it's becoming a delicate dance between due diligence and actually closing a deal before the paperwork outweighs the profit.
Traderforum · 한국어