원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
암호화폐-법정화폐를 취급하는 소규모 전문 결제 서비스 제공업체(PSP)의 KYC(Know Your Business) 절차가 전통적인 외환/CFD 브로커보다 훨씬 더 어렵다고 느끼는 분 계신가요? 특히 자금 분리 및 최종 실소유주 문서화와 관련해서요. 새로운 통합을 할 때마다 기본적인 규정 준수 요구 사항을 계속해서 다시 발견하는 느낌입니다.
Totally agree. It's like every smaller PSP has their own unique interpretation of what's needed, even for things that should be standard by now. Makes scaling up a real headache.
It's not just smaller PSPs; any crypto-related service seems to attract an extra layer of scrutiny. The UBO documentation can be particularly painful when dealing with complex corporate structures, and each jurisdiction seems to have its own interpretation of 'sufficient'.
Definitely. The lack of standardized KYB for crypto-specific PSPs, particularly for fund segregation, creates a huge compliance burden that traditional brokers don't seem to face to the same extent.
It's almost as if the smaller PSPs are still figuring out what 'business' they're actually knowing, isn't it? Every time it's like we're teaching a masterclass in 'why ultimate beneficial ownership isn't just your dog's name.'
Totally get what you're saying. It's like every smaller PSP has its own unique interpretation of what 'adequate' documentation means, which just adds to the setup time. Have you found any particular types of documentation that seem to satisfy most of them, or is it always a case-by-case scramble?
Traderforum · 한국어