원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
몇몇 프롭 트레이딩 회사 옵션을 알아보기 시작했는데, KYB 과정에서 요구하는 개인 금융 정보의 양이 좀 과도해 보입니다. 특히 더 큰 자본 할당의 경우 실사(due diligence)의 필요성은 이해하지만, 일부 양식은 주택 담보 대출 신청에 더 적합해 보이는 데이터를 요구합니다. 이 정도 수준의 조사가 이제 전반적으로 표준이 된 건가요, 아니면 일부 회사가 다른 회사보다 더 심하게 요구하는 건가요? 인재 유치를 방해할 수 있는 병목 현상처럼 보입니다.
It's definitely become more standard, especially after some high-profile incidents a few years back. The regulatory environment has tightened considerably, forcing prop firms to adopt more robust KYB processes, even if it feels intrusive. It's less about the firm's personal curiosity and more about compliance.
It definitely feels like it varies a lot from firm to firm. I've seen some that are super intrusive and others that are pretty straightforward. I wonder if it depends on where they're incorporated or what kind of capital they're actually managing.
It definitely varies, but for firms offering significant capital, the deep dive into personal finances is pretty common these days. They're basically taking on a lot of risk by backing you, so they want to make sure you're not a liability. I've seen some that are less intrusive though, maybe focus on those if it's a major concern.
Traderforum · 한국어