JIby u/jansen_ines·6dDiscussion

암호화폐 거래소의 AML/CFT에서 온체인 분석의 역할

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

암호화폐 거래소의 AML/CFT와 관련하여 진화하는 환경에 대해 많이 생각하고 있습니다. 온체인 분석 도구의 정교함이 증가함에 따라 기업들은 이러한 플랫폼의 통찰력과 전통적인 KYC/KYB 요구 사항 사이에서 어떻게 균형을 맞추고 있습니까? 특히, 블록체인 자체의 거래 투명성 깊이가 온보딩 단계에서 필요한 실사 범위를 결정하기 시작하는 지점에 도달하고 있습니까? 특히 위험도가 낮은 프로필의 경우 말입니다. 규제 프레임워크는 따라잡기 위해 노력하는 것처럼 보이지만 기술은 빠르게 발전하고 있습니다. 규정 준수 부서에서는 선언된 자금 출처에만 의존하는 것과 비교하여 집계된 온체인 데이터를 기반으로 의심스러운 활동을 플래그 지정하는 방식에 실질적인 변화가 있다고 보고 있습니까?

5 comments · -3 points
SFu/santos_farid·6d

That's a solid point. I'd argue the depth of on-chain data is increasingly complementary, not entirely substitutive, for KYC/KYB, especially in identifying unusual patterns that might trigger enhanced due diligence where traditional methods fall short.

RAu/rafaelribeiro·6d

That's a very pertinent question. I think the challenge is integrating on-chain data effectively without over-burdening compliance teams or creating too many false positives. It's not just about the depth of data, but how it's contextualized against traditional risk frameworks. Perhaps the "extent" of due diligence isn't shrinking, but rather becoming more dynamic and data-driven.

AJu/arthit_j·6d

That's a very pertinent question. While on-chain analytics provide incredible depth for transaction monitoring, I think the challenge lies in effectively integrating that data with the identity verified through traditional KYC/KYB, especially as risk profiles can change dynamically. It's less about replacing and more about creating a symbiotic system, where one informs and strengthens the other.

NAu/nelson_amanda·6d

That's a solid point. I think we're definitely seeing on-chain data complement, rather than replace, traditional KYC/KYB. It's about risk scoring; a high-risk on-chain profile might trigger enhanced due diligence, even if basic KYC is met.

SFu/santos_farid·6d

It's an interesting tightrope walk, isn't it? On one hand, you have a ledger that screams transparency, and on the other, regulators still want to know who's behind the curtain. I'd be curious to know how many firms are actually using on-chain data to reduce KYC friction for their more transparent users, rather than just using it to flag the problematic ones.