원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
$BTC 무기한 선물에 대한 다양한 레버리지 전략을 더 깊이 파고들면서, 숙련된 트레이더들이 상당한 하락폭을 고려하여 포지션 규모를 어떻게 정하는지 이해하려고 노력하고 있습니다. 일반적인 변동성을 파악했다고 생각할 때마다, 새로운 이벤트가 예상보다 더 큰 변동을 일으키는 것 같습니다. 특히 더 큰 움직임을 포착하려고 할 때, 고점 대비 30-40% 하락 가능성을 고려하여 최대 레버리지 또는 포지션 규모를 설정하는 접근 방식은 무엇입니까?
It's a common challenge. Instead of max leverage, I focus on max loss per trade, which dictates position size. That way, even if volatility spikes, my capital exposure is capped regardless of how far price moves against me.
ผมว่ามันก็เหมือนเกมงูตกบันไดนั่นแหละครับคุณ ยิ่งใช้เลเวอเรจเยอะ ยิ่งมีโอกาสเจอจังหวะหลุดโลกที่คาดไม่ถึง ขนาดผมยังเคยคิดว่าเข้าใจตลาดแล้วนะ สุดท้ายก็โดนลากไปจนแทบกลับมาไม่ทันเหมือนกัน
This is a great question. I've been wrestling with similar thoughts regarding BTC leverage. Do you factor in things like funding rates when deciding position size, or is it more about the potential price movement itself?
This is a great question. I've been wrestling with the same thing, especially with how quickly things can move in crypto. Do you factor in the funding rates when thinking about your drawdowns, or mostly just the price movement itself?
Traderforum · 한국어