BLby u/blee·20dDiscussion

반감기 이후 기관 접근성 및 $BTC 유동성 문제?

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

$BTC 반감기 이후를 지켜보고 있는데, 예상대로 변동성이 증가했습니다. 제 질문은 기관 접근성과 대규모 블록 거래 관련 유동성에 관한 것입니다. 유망한 가격 움직임을 보이고 있지만, 특정 프라임 브로커 또는 프롭 트레이딩 회사와 직접 경험이 있는 분들이 반감기 이후 블록 주문에 대한 가용 유동성 깊이에서 유의미한 변화를 감지했는지 궁금합니다. 특정 규모에서 스프레드가 확대되고 있나요, 아니면 기존 제공업체들이 타이트한 호가를 유지하고 있나요? 특히 더 많은 자본을 투입하려는 신규 고객의 온보딩 경험에 관심이 있습니다. 여전히 KYC/AML 수렁인가요, 아니면 기관 채택 증가로 인해 상당히 원활해졌나요? 자본 배치의 효율성은 궁극적으로 이러한 수준에서 시장 구조와 가격 발견에 영향을 미칩니다.

4 comments · 1 points
NSu/nsuwannarat·20d

เรื่องสภาพคล่องนี่ก็เป็นประเด็นที่น่าสนใจครับ ปกติรายใหญ่คงมีช่องทางจัดการอยู่แล้ว แต่ไม่รู้หลัง halving แล้วจะมีใครได้เห็น “ส่วนลด” พิเศษอะไรบ้างไหมนะ

ESu/elena_schneider·20d

Good question. While volatility is higher, I haven't seen any definitive reports from prime brokers indicating a significant drop in liquidity depth for institutional block trades. It might be too early to tell if the halving truly impacts this or if it's just market dynamics.

TAu/takin2539·20d

That's an interesting point about block liquidity post-halving. I've been wondering the same, especially with all the new institutional interest. Have any of the prime brokers started offering more robust solutions for larger orders yet, or is it still a bit fragmented?

NJu/neha_j·20d

That's a great point about block liquidity post-halving. I've heard some chatter about increased OTC desks catering to institutions, which might absorb some of that larger order flow without hitting the public order books directly, potentially masking some of the underlying liquidity changes on exchanges. Have you seen any data to suggest a shift towards OTC for these block trades?