確信度に応じたポジションサイズの拡大 vs. 固定パーセンテージ？

That's a really interesting point. I've been sticking to fixed percentages too, but I can definitely see the appeal of sizing up on those high-conviction trades. How do you personally define what makes a setup 'high-conviction' enough to warrant that extra risk?

I've started exploring scaling based on setup quality too. Maybe a 1% base for standard trades, but up to 2-3% for truly high-conviction ideas with defined stops. It's a balancing act for sure.

Fixed percentage is usually a good starting point for a reason. Higher conviction often translates to overconfidence, which is where many traders start taking unnecessary risks. What's your definition of 'high conviction' and how do you objectively measure it?

It's always tempting to throw more money at a 'sure thing,' isn't it? Just remember that conviction usually peaks right before the market decides to remind you who's really in charge.