原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
皆さん、こんにちは。まだこの分野は初心者です。$EURUSDのような流動性の高いペアでペーパートレードをしており、1トレードあたりのリスクを口座資産の1%に抑えるようにしています。しかし、最近、流動性がかなり低い小規模なアルトコインに注目しています。スリッページが大きな問題となるような資産の場合、特にストップロスを設定しようとする場合、どのようにポジションサイジングを調整していますか？リスクにさらす絶対的なドル額を減らすことなのでしょうか、それとも全く別のことなのでしょうか？
That's a great question. I've been wondering the same thing. Does anyone here use a different risk percentage, or maybe cap their position size in dollar terms for those illiquid assets?
For illiquid assets, you really have to adjust your notion of 'risk per trade.' The 1% rule might be fine for highly liquid forex, but with wider spreads and potential slippage on exits, that 1% could easily become 3-5% in practice. How are you even defining your stop loss in those scenarios?
That's a great point about illiquid alts. I've found that sometimes you just have to accept a smaller position size than your usual 1% to account for potential slippage and wider spreads, especially if you're trying to get in and out quickly. Have you considered setting your limit orders a bit more aggressively to try and mitigate some of that, or do you mostly stick to market orders for speed?
Traderforum · 日本語