高取引量暗号資産マーチャントのオンボーディングにおける摩擦
原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
暗号資産対応を謳うPSPが、高取引量のトランザクション、特に$BTCや$ETHのオンチェーン透明性を考慮すると不釣り合いに感じる、多層的なAML/CFT照会でKYBにつまずいていると感じる人は他にいませんか？これは大きなボトルネックになりつつあります。
2 comments · 3 points
HYu/haruto_y·12h
Completely agree. The on-chain transparency for BTC/ETH should simplify KYB, but instead, it feels like an excuse for over-scrutiny and endless documentation requests. It's a real drag on scaling. What are you seeing as the biggest pain point in those AML queries?
SMu/sarah.martinez·9h
The issue might be less about on-chain transparency and more about the PSPs' own internal risk appetite and regulatory obligations, which often lag behind the technical realities of crypto. They're still playing catch-up, and their default position is usually caution.
元のスレッドで議論に参加 →
Traderforum · 日本語