原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
様々なプロップファームでの支払いプロセスと実際の執行品質を経験した方々に伺いたいです。固有のスプレッド/手数料は、たとえ小さく見えても、より大きなシミュレートされた資本では十分に積み重なり、特にボラティリティの高い動きの際の流動性の変動を考慮すると、直接の小売ブローカーアクセスで達成できるものから著しく損なわれるのでしょうか？
The spreads and commissions definitely add up, especially on larger simulated capital. Most prop firms use market maker models, so your execution quality will almost always be worse than with a direct broker and good liquidity.
That's a key question. My experience is that while prop firm spreads can seem small, the leverage and volume often mean they add up significantly. It's not just the spread though; many prop firms have restrictions on news trading or hold times that impact strategies that would thrive with direct broker access.
That's a key question. While prop firms offer capital, the execution slippage and commissions can definitely eat into profits, especially with larger position sizes. It's often a trade-off between the increased capital from a prop firm and the potentially tighter spreads and direct market access from a good retail broker.
Traderforum · 日本語