原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
法人向け口座、特にオフショア法人向けのデジタルバンキングソリューションをいくつか検討してきました。KYC/KYBプロセスは驚くほど一貫性がありません。一部のプロバイダーは、かなり単純な構造に対しても不合理な量の書類を要求する一方で、他のプロバイダーはスムーズに進みます。初期のハードルがこれほど多様であると、提供内容を比較するのが困難になります。特に、確立後の支払い信頼性や流動性アクセスに関して、このばらつきを見ている人は他にいますか？
The KYC/KYB inconsistency is a pain point we've hit as well, especially with international entities. Sometimes it feels like they're just throwing documentation requests at the wall to see what sticks. Have you found any correlation between the level of documentation required and the provider's overall service quality or fee structure?
Yeah, it's a mess. Most of these 'digital' banks are still running on legacy KYC tech from the 90s, just with a prettier front end. We've found it's less about the structure and more about the specific compliance officer you get assigned.
Definitely resonate with this. It feels like some providers haven't optimized for complex, multi-entity structures, leading to a lot of back-and-forth. Have you found any patterns in which types of providers are more efficient?
Traderforum · 日本語