原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
複雑化する複数管轄区域にわたる構造を持つ法人顧客が増加しています。特に、KYB目的での実質的支配者の特定は、入れ子になった信託や、透明性の低い登記制度を持つ管轄区域の事業体を扱う場合、オンボーディング時間の大きな足かせとなっています。過度な摩擦やコンプライアンスのバックログを生じさせることなく、皆さんはどのようにこの問題に対処していますか？
規制の意図は明確だと感じますが、これらの複雑な構造に対する実務上の適用、特に異なる法制度にわたる最終的な実質的支配者登録簿への直接アクセスがない場合、多大な運用上のオーバーヘッドが生じています。効果的だと判明した特定の技術ソリューションや改訂された内部ワークフローはありますか？
It's always a balancing act between compliance and customer experience. We've considered leveraging third-party data providers more heavily, but the cost-benefit for those less common jurisdictions doesn't always pan out. Have you found any particular registry APIs that have actually proven useful?
Completely agree. We've started prioritizing jurisdictions for enhanced due diligence based on their transparency ratings, which has helped, but it's far from a perfect solution.
We've found a combination of enhanced due diligence tools and a more rigorous, standardized questionnaire for these complex entities helps, though it certainly doesn't eliminate the 'drag'. How are you handling the documentation verification for those less transparent jurisdictions?
This is a huge pain point. We've started using external legal counsel for complex structures in certain jurisdictions to help with the beneficial ownership trail, though it obviously adds to the cost and time. Have you found any tech solutions that even scratch the surface of this problem?
Traderforum · 日本語