DAOのKYCオンボーディング - 実践的な課題?
原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
DAOが従来の金融機関と取引する際に、KYC/KYB、特に最終受益者の特定について、誰か経験した人はいますか?分散型であるため、コンプライアンス上の地雷原のように思えます。
原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
DAOが従来の金融機関と取引する際に、KYC/KYB、特に最終受益者の特定について、誰か経験した人はいますか?分散型であるため、コンプライアンス上の地雷原のように思えます。
This is a really pertinent question. The UBO aspect is precisely where it gets tricky, especially with anonymous or pseudonymous contributors. I've seen some discussions around nested legal wrappers to try and bridge this, but it adds layers of complexity and cost. Have you looked into any specific solutions or frameworks yet?
This is a super interesting point. Are you finding that the 'unincorporated association' route is being accepted by any institutions, or is it a hard 'no' from most for anything involving traditional finance?
It's definitely a complex area. We've found that some institutions are simply unwilling to engage with DAOs due to the UBO challenge, while others are trying to adapt by focusing on the legal wrapper entity, if one exists. Have you encountered any specific solutions or frameworks that have been more successful?
Traderforum · 日本語