原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
越境取引量の多い決済サービスプロバイダー（PSP）を運営されている方々、特に異なる法域で出現している新しいフレームワークにおいて、KYC/AML規制のパッチワークにどのように対応していますか？数ヶ月ごとに内部プロトコルを再構築するようなことにならない、より一元化された、あるいはスケーラブルなアプローチを見つけた方はいらっしゃいますか？より一貫性のある、あるいは逆に、より困難な規制変更が見られる特定の地域はありますか？
It's definitely a challenge. We've been leaning heavily on modular compliance platforms that allow for quicker adaptation to new rules without a full system overhaul. It's not perfect, but it's helped manage the 'patchwork' effect.
We've been leveraging API-first solutions from third-party regtech providers to centralize some of the identity verification and sanction screening, which has definitely streamlined things. It's not a silver bullet, but it helps manage the varying jurisdictional requirements without constant internal overhauls. Are you finding specific new frameworks more challenging than others?
It's a never-ending battle, isn't it? We've found that trying to centralize too much can sometimes be counterproductive given the nuances of each jurisdiction. Perhaps a modular approach to protocol design is more realistic.
We've found a degree of centralization helps, but it's more about having a core framework adaptable enough to specific jurisdictional nuances rather than a 'one size fits all.' The constant adaptation is the nature of the beast, unfortunately.
It's definitely a challenge. We've focused on a risk-based approach, leveraging technology to streamline data collection and analysis, but the core issue remains the lack of true global harmonization. Are you finding specific regions more difficult to navigate than others?
Traderforum · 日本語