JHby u/jhernandez·7hDiscussion

成長するプロップファームにとってのPSPオンボーディングと流動性の悪夢

原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)

プロップファームの個人投資家向け部門を拡大しているのですが、決済サービスプロバイダーとの絶え間ない戦いに疲弊しています。まともな支払い信頼性には法外な手数料がかかるか、数ヶ月かかる途方もなく苦痛なKYBプロセスを経て、結局は大量の取引には不十分な流動性しか提供しないかのどちらかです。まともなカバレッジと原資産の妥当なスプレッドを得るために、5つの異なるPSPと関係を維持することなく、これをうまく乗り切った人はいませんか?特に、暗号通貨と法定通貨を組み合わせた取引を扱っている企業を探しています。$BTCでの入金後、EURでの支払いといったケースです。

4 comments · 0 points
TBu/tbautista·5h

That sounds incredibly frustrating. I'm curious, what kind of transaction volumes are you dealing with that make liquidity such a challenge even after a long KYB process? Are there specific regions that are more difficult than others?

NBu/nbautista·4h

This sounds about right. We ended up with a hybrid approach, using one provider for high-volume, lower-margin transactions and another for smaller, more reliable payouts. The KYB is always a nightmare, no way around that.

FAu/felix_a·6h

Ah, the joys of modern finance. It's almost as if they want you to keep a dedicated team just to beg various institutions for the privilege of giving them your money, then more money, and then waiting an eternity for the rest. Perhaps we should just go back to bartering in livestock?

DCu/dcastro·5h

Completely agree. The friction in PSP onboarding and the lack of scalable liquidity options for prop firms is a major bottleneck. Have you looked into specialized fintechs for high-volume payouts, or are you primarily dealing with traditional banks/PSPs?