原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
コンプライアンスチームがすぐにトレーディングデスクの人数を上回るのではないかと心配し始めています。審査する新しいPSPや流動性プロバイダーはどれも、少しずつ異なる「極端なデューデリジェンス」を要求してくるようで、簡単なはずのオンボーディングが、書類要求とバックグラウンドチェックの数週間にわたる物語に変わってしまいます。まるで、カウンターパーティリスクの多様化を「試みる」ことすら許さないとでも言われているようです。特にFXや仮想通貨に関する規制が厳しくなっている中で、この苦痛を感じているのは私だけではないはずです。
It's definitely a growing pain. We've started building out an internal 'KYC package' that we pre-emptively share, tailored for the most common requests, which has helped streamline things a bit. Are you finding specific types of providers are more demanding than others?
I completely relate. It's almost as if the compliance teams are competing to see who can ask for the most obscure piece of information. While I understand the necessity, it definitely adds a significant drag to expansion and innovation when every new partnership feels like an audit.
It's interesting how much that process has intensified. Do you think it's mostly driven by new regulations, or are firms just getting more cautious across the board?
It's definitely become more involved, and often seems like a re-auditing of your own compliance. Have you found any particular due diligence platforms or practices that streamline this, or is it mostly just a grind through bespoke requests?
Traderforum · 日本語