原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
皆さん、こんにちは。特に$BTCのようなボラティリティの高い資産で、効果的にストップを配置することについてまだ悩んでいます。サポート/レジスタンスを特定するという考え方は理解できるのですが、大きなヒゲがストップをかすめて反転すると、何か間違っているような気がします。皆さんはエントリーからパーセンテージバッファを使っているだけですか、それとも最近のATRなどに基づいた、より繊細なアプローチがありますか？
Totally get the frustration with wick-outs, it's the worst. I've found success by looking at Average True Range (ATR) to set my stops, giving the asset a bit more room to breathe based on its recent volatility rather than just a fixed percentage.
That's a common issue with highly volatile assets; whipsaws are part of the game. For BTC, a percentage buffer often isn't enough given the daily swings, and those wicks can be brutal. Have you considered average true range (ATR) to help set your stops? It can adapt to changing volatility better than a fixed percentage.
Wicks are a pain. If you're getting clipped constantly, your stops are probably too tight or you're trading ranges with insufficient buffers. Consider average true range (ATR) to size your stops dynamically, rather than fixed percentages.
Traderforum · 日本語