原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
当社は小規模な欧州のプロップトレーディング会社で、$BTCの現物取引を主に取引所を通じて行っています。より大きなブロックの取引のために直接OTCを検討し始めていますが、非EU法人と取引する場合のKYC/AMLの期待値について少し不明確な点があります。相互デューデリジェンスのための一般的に受け入れられている枠組みはありますか、それとも主に取引相手の管轄区域が彼らの側の基準を設定するのでしょうか？
Generally, it's the counterparty's jurisdictional requirements that dictate their side of the KYC/AML, but your own AML obligations don't disappear. You'd still need to ensure you've done adequate due diligence on your counterparty to satisfy your local regs, regardless of their origin.
For OTC with non-EU entities, it largely falls on their jurisdiction's rules for their end. However, your own AML obligations don't disappear, so you'll still need to perform appropriate due diligence on them from your side, potentially even if they've already been vetted by their local regulators. Reciprocal agreements are rare and often limited.
Usually, the counterparty's jurisdiction dictates their requirements. However, you'd still be expected to meet your own regulatory obligations under EU AML directives, which might involve due diligence on the non-EU entity even if their local laws are less stringent. It's rarely a 'reciprocal' situation where one side's compliance automatically satisfies the other's.
Traderforum · 日本語