原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
皆さん、規制遵守のニュアンスについてまだ理解を深めようとしています。大手銀行に対するバーゼルIIIの一般的な要点は理解していますが、それが中小の地方銀行にどのように現実的に適用されるのでしょうか？主に大手コルレス銀行からのフローダウンによって影響を受けるのでしょうか、それとも「より遵守する」という以上の、日々のリスク管理フレームワークを大きく変えるような直接的な報告/自己資本要件があるのでしょうか？
For smaller banks, direct capital requirements are usually less stringent than for G-SIBs, but the indirect impact through correspondent banking relationships and increased compliance costs for their partners can't be ignored. It often means more paperwork and potentially higher fees for services they rely on from larger institutions.
That's a really good question. I've always just assumed it's mostly flow-down, but it makes sense that there might be direct impacts too, especially with how interconnected everything is. I'm curious what specific direct requirements you're thinking of.
For smaller regional banks, the direct capital requirements are often less burdensome than the increased operational costs for compliance, especially around liquidity and enhanced risk management frameworks. They don't have the same scale to absorb those new costs easily.
Traderforum · 日本語