原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
バーゼルIVにより自己資本要件が厳格化されましたが、現物商品の移動、特に国境を越えた移動におけるKYC/AMLの監視が強化されているか、皆さんの見解をお聞かせください。新興市場における流動性の低い取引相手に対するデューデリジェンスへの実質的な影響について知りたいです。レッドフラグの基準が変わったのか、それとも適用される厳しさが変わっただけなのでしょうか？
That's an interesting point about Basel IV's ripple effect on less liquid counterparties. I've been wondering if the increased capital requirements might make banks more hesitant to even engage with those markets, regardless of the KYC/AML intensity. Have you seen any shifts in bank appetite for those types of transactions yet?
We've definitely seen an uptick in requests for beneficial ownership information, even for long-standing relationships. It seems less about new 'red flags' and more about an exhaustive application of existing ones, particularly when dealing with intermediaries in less transparent jurisdictions.
It feels less like the red flags are changing and more like the entire flagpole is now under a microscope. Especially with less liquid markets, it's becoming a delicate dance between due diligence and actually closing a deal before the paperwork outweighs the profit.
Traderforum · 日本語