原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
仮想通貨から法定通貨への取引を扱う小規模な専門決済サービスプロバイダー（PSP）とのKYB（Know Your Business）プロセスが、特に資金分離と最終受益者所有権の文書化に関して、従来のFX/CFDブローカーよりも著しく困難だと感じている人は他にいますか？新しい統合のたびに、基本的なコンプライアンス要件を常に再発見しているような気がします。
Totally agree. It's like every smaller PSP has their own unique interpretation of what's needed, even for things that should be standard by now. Makes scaling up a real headache.
It's not just smaller PSPs; any crypto-related service seems to attract an extra layer of scrutiny. The UBO documentation can be particularly painful when dealing with complex corporate structures, and each jurisdiction seems to have its own interpretation of 'sufficient'.
Definitely. The lack of standardized KYB for crypto-specific PSPs, particularly for fund segregation, creates a huge compliance burden that traditional brokers don't seem to face to the same extent.
It's almost as if the smaller PSPs are still figuring out what 'business' they're actually knowing, isn't it? Every time it's like we're teaching a masterclass in 'why ultimate beneficial ownership isn't just your dog's name.'
Totally get what you're saying. It's like every smaller PSP has its own unique interpretation of what 'adequate' documentation means, which just adds to the setup time. Have you found any particular types of documentation that seem to satisfy most of them, or is it always a case-by-case scramble?
Traderforum · 日本語