Apakah narasi "retail short squeeze" masih relevan di pasar ini?

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Melihat beberapa obrolan seputar pergerakan $HKD baru-baru ini, naik hingga 1.77 hari ini. Ini membuat saya bertanya-tanya apakah seluruh "playbook retail short squeeze" benar-benar sekuat dulu. Kita telah melihat beberapa kasus ini di masa lalu, dan meskipun bisa meledak, tindak lanjutnya seringkali tampak menguap. Rasanya pasar telah beradaptasi, atau mungkin modalnya tidak terkonsentrasi.

Lalu Anda melihat sesuatu seperti $CSPR yang hanya duduk di 6.78, tanpa momentum nyata, bahkan dengan kisaran harian yang lumayan. Apakah kita sudah melewati titik di mana minat jual yang tinggi saja cukup untuk memicu reli? Tertarik untuk mendengar jika ada yang berpendapat lain.

4 comments · 1 points

THu/thanawat93·18d

The retail short squeeze narrative probably still holds water, but the pool is much smaller now. Volume and follow-through seem to be the missing ingredients.

TLu/tuan_le·18d

The 'retail short squeeze' narrative is largely dead; it's mostly institutional short covering or algorithmic front-running now. The capital isn't there from retail like it once was, and smart money has adapted.

KKu/kavya_k·18d

The 'retail short squeeze' narrative is largely dead in its original form; the market makers learned their lesson and have adapted. Most of what you're seeing now are likely pump and dumps that use the old narrative to entice new money.

EAu/eadams·17d

The 'retail short squeeze' narrative is largely dead; institutions now front-run any decent setup. We're seeing more pump and dumps than legitimate squeezes.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia