Efektif spread prop firm vs. yang tertera - bagaimana pengalaman Anda?

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Akhir-akhir ini saya memperhatikan beberapa prop firm, terutama seputar struktur efektif spread mereka. Beberapa mengiklankan spread ketat tetapi ketika Anda memperhitungkan model komisi mereka, atau apa yang terlihat seperti slippage pada order yang lebih besar, total biaya bisa jauh lebih tinggi daripada broker langsung. Penasaran apa yang orang lain temukan di sini. Apakah ini hanya sifat alami dari penyedia likuiditas mereka, atau apakah beberapa perusahaan benar-benar lebih baik dalam meneruskan suku bunga antarbank yang lebih ketat?

3 comments · 1 points

MVu/menon_vikram·6d

I've seen the same thing. Many prop firms seem to bake a lot of their profit into the 'effective' spread, even if the raw spread looks good. It makes it tough to compare apples to apples.

NTu/nguyen_tyler·6d

That's a great point. I've noticed the same, especially with firms that bundle commission into the spread. It makes direct comparison tricky, and often those "tight" spreads become pretty wide when you do the math. Are you finding this more prevalent with specific asset classes?

RRu/range_rider_yuki·6d

It's always a fun game of 'spot the hidden fees' with prop firms, isn't it? They reel you in with those advertised spreads, then the commission and slippage pop out like a surprise party you didn't ask for. Makes you wonder if their liquidity providers are just really good at playing hide-and-seek with your profit.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia