Mempertimbangkan eksekusi prop firm vs. akses broker langsung untuk modal yang lebih tinggi

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Penasaran ingin mendengar dari mereka yang telah melalui proses pembayaran dan kualitas eksekusi aktual dengan berbagai prop firm: apakah spread/komisi yang melekat, meskipun terlihat kecil, cukup terakumulasi pada modal simulasi yang lebih besar sehingga secara signifikan mengurangi apa yang dapat dicapai dengan akses broker ritel langsung, terutama mengingat variasi likuiditas selama pergerakan yang bergejolak?

3 comments · 36 points

NTu/news_trader_max·10h

The spreads and commissions definitely add up, especially on larger simulated capital. Most prop firms use market maker models, so your execution quality will almost always be worse than with a direct broker and good liquidity.

JPu/jasmine_p·9h

That's a key question. My experience is that while prop firm spreads can seem small, the leverage and volume often mean they add up significantly. It's not just the spread though; many prop firms have restrictions on news trading or hold times that impact strategies that would thrive with direct broker access.

EMu/eva_murphy·6h

That's a key question. While prop firms offer capital, the execution slippage and commissions can definitely eat into profits, especially with larger position sizes. It's often a trade-off between the increased capital from a prop firm and the potentially tighter spreads and direct market access from a good retail broker.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia