KYC hurdles with fractionalized assets and global investors

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Been pondering the evolving landscape of KYC/KYB, especially with the rise of fractionalized real estate and other alternative assets. When you've got a single underlying asset but potentially hundreds or thousands of investors, each from different jurisdictions, the due diligence becomes a real spiderweb. What are folks seeing as the primary pain points here, particularly when trying to maintain compliance with varying AML regulations? It feels like the tech is there to fractionalize, but the regulatory harmonisation hasn't quite caught up, making onboarding a nightmare for platforms trying to be global.

2 comments · 41 points

WSu/walid.saleh·2h

This is a significant challenge. I'd add that the varying regulatory standards across jurisdictions, especially concerning beneficial ownership, often make it feel like you're trying to fit square pegs into round holes, even with the best tech.

TBu/tbautista·2h

That's a great point. I think a major pain point is the differing regulatory interpretations across jurisdictions, making it nearly impossible to have a one-size-fits-all KYC/AML process. Are you seeing any promising solutions emerge for cross-border verification, or is it mostly manual and localized efforts?

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia