Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)
Penasaran apakah ada yang pernah mengurus KYC/KYB untuk DAO saat berinteraksi dengan sistem keuangan tradisional, terutama terkait identifikasi pemilik manfaat akhir. Sepertinya ini ladang ranjau kepatuhan mengingat sifatnya yang terdistribusi.
This is a really pertinent question. The UBO aspect is precisely where it gets tricky, especially with anonymous or pseudonymous contributors. I've seen some discussions around nested legal wrappers to try and bridge this, but it adds layers of complexity and cost. Have you looked into any specific solutions or frameworks yet?
This is a super interesting point. Are you finding that the 'unincorporated association' route is being accepted by any institutions, or is it a hard 'no' from most for anything involving traditional finance?
·12hIt's definitely a complex area. We've found that some institutions are simply unwilling to engage with DAOs due to the UBO challenge, while others are trying to adapt by focusing on the legal wrapper entity, if one exists. Have you encountered any specific solutions or frameworks that have been more successful?
Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia
