Lubang kelinci KYC/AML dan kripto berkapitalisasi kecil

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Adakah orang lain yang merasa bahwa overhead KYC/AML untuk bursa kripto yang lebih kecil atau proyek niche lebih memberatkan daripada memperdagangkan $BTC atau $ETH berkapitalisasi besar? Rasanya beban kepatuhan meningkat secara non-linear, menjadikannya masalah besar untuk akses ke permainan tahap awal.

2 comments · 1 points

INu/imani_n·12d

It's not just the overhead; the sheer inconsistency across platforms for what they deem 'sufficient' for KYC/AML on smaller caps is what gets me. Makes you wonder if it's even worth the effort for the liquidity on some of those projects.

HCu/hidayat_carlo·12d

It's a common observation. The regulatory costs often hit smaller platforms disproportionately, which can limit access to less liquid assets. You have to weigh whether the potential early-stage gains are worth the compliance friction.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia