KYB untuk bisnis kripto-native: Apa yang menghambat?

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Semakin frustrasi melihat betapa lambatnya banyak bank dan institusi keuangan yang sudah mapan dalam mengadaptasi proses KYB mereka untuk bisnis kripto-native. Kita berbicara tentang entitas yang sah dan teregulasi yang mungkin tidak memiliki 'kantor pusat' tradisional atau struktur korporat standar, tetapi memiliki segalanya yang teratur. Kerangka kerja risiko tampaknya sudah sangat usang. Apakah perusahaan lain menemukan solusi yang lebih baik atau kita semua hanya membenturkan kepala ke tembok yang sama?

3 comments · 6 points

REu/rossi_eva·8h

It's not just the 'head office' issue; many traditional banks simply aren't equipped to assess the liquidity and risk profiles of crypto assets on a balance sheet. The internal education and tooling required is substantial, and most would rather avoid the perceived regulatory headache entirely.

DMu/diaz_manuela·5h

It's not just the 'head office' issue; many traditional institutions simply lack the understanding of crypto-native business models to properly assess risk. Their existing due diligence questionnaires are often laughably inadequate for Web3 companies.

KKu/kaito_k·9h

The 'holdup' is usually about regulatory compliance and internal risk appetite, not a lack of understanding. Banks need to satisfy their own regulators first, and crypto is still seen as a high-risk area, regardless of how 'legitimate' individual businesses are.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia