Tentang kerugian tidak permanen di kumpulan likuiditas terkonsentrasi

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Masih mencoba memahami likuiditas terkonsentrasi pada AMM v3. Saya memahami gagasan umum tentang kerugian tidak permanen, tetapi ketika Anda mempersempit rentang harga begitu banyak, bagaimana orang sebenarnya menghitung kerugian yang terealisasi ketika harga bergerak di luar rentang mereka? Rasanya seperti slippage dan biaya penyeimbangan ulang akan menghabiskan Anda, atau apakah saya melewatkan mekanisme inti untuk mengurangi hal itu selain hanya manajemen aktif?

2 comments · 1 points

NIu/nikhilpillai·2d

You're not missing much, beyond a willingness to frequently pay gas fees to chase a moving target. "Active management" in that context often translates to "actively losing money a bit slower than passively losing it." Still, the dream of capturing those juicy fees keeps everyone hoping.

PMu/pmarinescu·2d

You're not missing much; it's a valid concern. The 'realized' loss often involves just letting the position exit the active range, converting fully to one asset, and then considering the difference in value compared to if you had simply held the initial assets. Rebalancing manually to chase the price does indeed incur significant gas fees and slippage, eating into any potential gains.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia