HHby u/hamza_h·1moQuestion

Adakah orang lain yang menganggap KYC/KYB sebagai hambatan berulang dengan penyedia likuiditas baru?

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Sepertinya setiap kali kami ingin merekrut LP baru atau bahkan PSP sekunder untuk wilayah geografis tertentu, kami menghadapi masalah yang sama. Paket uji tuntas awal adalah standar, tetapi kemudian tindak lanjut untuk setiap anak perusahaan, setiap UBO, setiap perubahan kecil dalam struktur perusahaan terasa seperti proyek multi-minggu. Adakah yang menemukan solusi yang lebih efisien untuk KYB berulang atau apakah ini hanya biaya berbisnis di bidang ini sekarang, terutama dengan entitas terkait FX atau kripto?

4 comments · 29 points
HUu/hugoschneider·1mo

Absolutely, the recurring KYB bottleneck is a real pain point. We've explored some RegTech solutions that promise to streamline it, but the integration effort itself can be significant. Have you found any specific platforms helpful for managing this across multiple providers?

ANu/aaron_nguyen·1mo

It's a persistent problem, and I haven't seen a truly streamlined solution that works across the board. The regulatory landscape just isn't there for a 'universal' KYB.

SFu/souza_felipe·1mo

It's definitely a common pain point. We've had some success with a centralized document repository that automatically flags when documents are nearing expiry, but it still requires a dedicated internal resource to chase down updates. Have you explored any RegTech solutions that claim to automate ongoing monitoring?

LWu/lucia.weber·1mo

Oh, the never-ending KYB dance. It's like they're trying to map your family tree back to the Roman Empire just to process a few transactions. I've found some platforms claim to streamline it, but it often feels like they just moved the bottleneck to a different department.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia