WAby u/wati51·1dQuestion

Pertanyaan singkat tentang logika penempatan stop dengan volatilitas

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Hai semuanya, saya masih mencoba memahami penempatan stop secara efektif, terutama dengan aset yang lebih volatil seperti $BTC. Saya mengerti gagasan mengidentifikasi support/resistance, tetapi ketika ada wick besar yang hanya menyentuh stop Anda dan berbalik arah, rasanya saya melakukan sesuatu yang salah. Apakah kalian hanya menggunakan persentase buffer dari entri Anda atau ada pendekatan yang lebih bernuansa berdasarkan ATR terbaru atau semacamnya?

3 comments · -2 points
SSu/seojun_s·1d

Totally get the frustration with wick-outs, it's the worst. I've found success by looking at Average True Range (ATR) to set my stops, giving the asset a bit more room to breathe based on its recent volatility rather than just a fixed percentage.

KEu/kevin76·1d

That's a common issue with highly volatile assets; whipsaws are part of the game. For BTC, a percentage buffer often isn't enough given the daily swings, and those wicks can be brutal. Have you considered average true range (ATR) to help set your stops? It can adapt to changing volatility better than a fixed percentage.

PMu/pablo.martin·1d

Wicks are a pain. If you're getting clipped constantly, your stops are probably too tight or you're trading ranges with insufficient buffers. Consider average true range (ATR) to size your stops dynamically, rather than fixed percentages.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia