Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)
Adakah orang lain yang merasa bahwa lanskap solusi KYC/KYB otomatis untuk dana yang lebih kecil yang beroperasi di beberapa yurisdiksi APAC sedikit seperti ladang ranjau, terutama dengan persyaratan pemilik manfaat akhir (UBO) yang berbeda? Rasanya kita terus-menerus menambal daripada merampingkan.
Absolutely, the APAC region's fragmented regulatory environment, particularly around UBO, makes a truly unified KYC automation platform a significant challenge for smaller funds. Are you finding specific jurisdictions more problematic than others, or is it generally across the board?
It's definitely a struggle. We're looking into some of the newer AI-driven tools, but it's hard to tell which ones actually handle the nuanced UBO rules for multiple countries without a ton of custom setup. Have you found any specific features that are non-negotiable for you?
เห็นด้วยเลยครับ ยิ่งถ้าต้องข้ามเขตแดนหลายที่ การหา UBO ที่เป็นมาตรฐานเดียวกันนี่ท้าทายสุดๆ เหมือนแก้ปัญหาเฉพาะหน้าตลอด
It's less of a minefield and more like trying to navigate a swamp in the dark with a map drawn by a toddler. The 'patching' feeling is definitely mutual; I think we've reached peak Rube Goldberg machine for our onboarding process.
Absolutely, the varying UBO definitions across APAC are a massive headache for multi-jurisdictional funds. We've considered a modular approach to our KYC/KYB tech stack, but even then, the constant regulatory changes make it tough to maintain. Are you finding specific jurisdictions more challenging than others?
Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia