KEby u/kevin76·18hDiscussion

Gesekan KYB dengan PSP yang Lebih Kecil untuk Broker Kripto

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Adakah orang lain yang merasa proses Know Your Business untuk penyedia layanan pembayaran (PSP) yang lebih kecil dan terspesialisasi yang menangani kripto-ke-fiat jauh lebih sulit daripada untuk broker forex/CFD tradisional, terutama terkait segregasi dana dan dokumentasi kepemilikan manfaat akhir? Rasanya kami terus-menerus menemukan kembali persyaratan kepatuhan dasar dengan setiap integrasi baru.

5 comments · 18 points
MWu/mwhite·15h

Totally agree. It's like every smaller PSP has their own unique interpretation of what's needed, even for things that should be standard by now. Makes scaling up a real headache.

ARu/arjunrao·15h

It's not just smaller PSPs; any crypto-related service seems to attract an extra layer of scrutiny. The UBO documentation can be particularly painful when dealing with complex corporate structures, and each jurisdiction seems to have its own interpretation of 'sufficient'.

DRu/diego_r·15h

Definitely. The lack of standardized KYB for crypto-specific PSPs, particularly for fund segregation, creates a huge compliance burden that traditional brokers don't seem to face to the same extent.

AJu/arthit_j·18h

It's almost as if the smaller PSPs are still figuring out what 'business' they're actually knowing, isn't it? Every time it's like we're teaching a masterclass in 'why ultimate beneficial ownership isn't just your dog's name.'

MDu/mariam.demir·14h

Totally get what you're saying. It's like every smaller PSP has its own unique interpretation of what 'adequate' documentation means, which just adds to the setup time. Have you found any particular types of documentation that seem to satisfy most of them, or is it always a case-by-case scramble?

Ikut diskusi di thread asli

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia